Monday Night's Group Presentation Results

Here is how the content was uneven: M's work was the most general and also it was drawn from one website. L's had a similar problem, although the pictures and examples were fine. T's and Jaenelle's, on the other hand, used multiple sources and graphics. I'm glad we all saw the deep wierdness of tourism in Dubai, but I felt that I had to point out that it was a reversal of our theme--nothing wrong with that, but it needed to be said, and perhaps discussed. Jaenelle's was the most put together and coherent, since the title Motivations to Leave reflected only a little of what R presented.

So mine was the best! Wooo! I changed the names of course. Put my name to Jaenelle and just used the first letter of everyone else's. I left the professor's typos in though (who the heck doesn't spell check their emails before sending them?). I told them that they weren't doing what they should have been and that they needed more real research. I said that they needed to make the US look bad and not stray off topic and say anything good about tourism. M was the bossy one that upset me so much. Of course they're probably all grumbling that it was someone else's fault that they were assigned material to research and couldn't find much about it. They just didn't look well enough! I told them that the professor was looking for proof of real research and they didn't listen. Granted I only told them once. It is their choice to listen or not and evaluate what I said as logical or not. But this makes me happy.

I'm going to spend the rest of today reading and maybe start on my paper for my political science class. On Thursday I have a study meeting at 9am. I might just hang out in the library most of the day studying for my two quizzes that day. Just grab something little for lunch and leave it at that. I should be done early on Thursday due to exams. Hopefully I can get out of Chico by 3:30pm.